"When people who use drugs can't differentiate between medical care and cops, it's a problem." Compounding risks of law Enforcement Harassment & Punitive Healthcare Policies.

BACKGROUND: Community-based harm reduction programming is widely recognized as an effective strategy for reducing the increased risks for and spread of HIV, HCV, and for reducing the growing rate of overdose deaths among people who use drugs (PWUD). PWUD in the United States (US) are a highly justice-involved population, also at increased risk for law enforcement interaction, arrest, and incarceration. These risks compound and interact in the context of criminalization and law enforcement surveillance. Justice involvement increases risks for overdose and for riskier injecting behavior among PWUD, in turn increasing HCV and HIV risks. In Central and Southern Appalachia specifically, PWUD have identified fear of law enforcement harassment and arrest as a barrier to engaging in harm reduction behavior, and a deterrent to seeking help at the scene of an overdose. Moreover, stigmatizing and punitive treatment in healthcare settings can deter PWUD from seeking care, with life or death consequences. This evaluation research study assessing the successes and impacts of a grant-funded project to increase access to safer drug consumption supplies and overdose prevention education for PWUD, including justice-involved participants of a syringe access program (SAP), in public housing and beyond in a South-Central Appalachian setting used key informant and opportunistic sampling. Mixed-methods data were compiled and collected including secondary program data; primary interview and participant-observation data. RESULTS: The evaluation research identified that grant deliverables were largely achieved, despite challenges presented by the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, SAP participants and staff reported larger themes surrounding grant-funded activities, in which they perceived that widespread local law enforcement harassment of PWUD increased participants' risks for overdose death and infectious disease risks and that punitive local healthcare settings and policies acted as deterrents to care-seeking for many PWUD. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the evaluation research found that participants' experiences with and perceptions of local law enforcement harassment combined with their understandings and experiences of local punitive healthcare settings and policies; together compounding and increasing overdose risks and negative health consequences for local justice-involved PWUD.

Naloxone Accessibility by Standing Order in North Carolina Community Pharmacies.

BACKGROUND: According to a standing order in North Carolina (NC), naloxone can be purchased without a provider prescription. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to examine whether same-day naloxone accessibility and cost vary by pharmacy type and rurality in NC. METHODS: A cross-sectional telephone audit of 202 NC community pharmacies stratified by pharmacy type and county of origin was conducted in March and April 2023. Trained "secret shoppers" enacted a standardized script and recorded whether naloxone was available and its cost. We examined the relationship between out-of-pocket naloxone cost, pharmacy type, and rurality. RESULTS: Naloxone could be purchased in 53% of the pharmacies contacted; 26% incorrectly noting that naloxone could be filled only with a provider prescription and 21% did not sell naloxone. Naloxone availability by standing order was statistically different by pharmacy type (chain/independent) (χ2 = 20.58, df = 4, P value < 0.001), with a higher frequency of willingness to dispense according to the standing order by chain pharmacies in comparison to independent pharmacies. The average quoted cost for naloxone nasal spray at chain pharmacies was $84.69; the cost was significantly more ($113.54; P < 0.001) at independent pharmacies. Naloxone cost did not significantly differ by pharmacy rurality (F2,136 = 2.38, P = 0.10). CONCLUSION: Approximately half of NC community pharmacies audited dispense naloxone according to the statewide standing order, limiting same-day access to this life-saving medication. Costs were higher at independent pharmacies, which could be due to store-level policies. Future studies should further investigate these cost differences, especially as intranasal naloxone transitions from a prescription only to over-the-counter product.

A Brief Online Training to Address Pharmacists' Willingness to Dispense Buprenorphine.

BACKGROUND: The recent passage of the Mainstreaming Addiction Treatment (MAT) Act could increase the number of patients seeking to fill buprenorphine prescriptions at community pharmacies; however, multiple barriers limit community pharmacists' ability and willingness to dispense buprenorphine. We assess whether a brief online buprenorphine training program (Buprenorphine Understanding in the Pharmacy Environment) improves community pharmacists' outcomes, including willingness to dispense buprenorphine. METHODS: A convenience sample of practicing community pharmacists participated in a 30-minute buprenorphine training. The training was codeveloped with pharmacy advisors and presented solutions to common buprenorphine dispensing barriers. Participants completed a pretest and posttest that assessed their buprenorphine knowledge (5 multiple-choice items based on training content), self-efficacy to engage in various buprenorphine-related behaviors (7 items), buprenorphine attitudes (8 items), and willingness to dispense buprenorphine to 4 different types of customers. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and paired-samples t tests were used to evaluate the impact of the training on pharmacist outcomes. RESULTS: Of 266 individuals who accessed the pretest, 104 responses were included in the analysis (response rate, 39%). Buprenorphine Understanding in the Pharmacy Environment improved pharmacists' mean buprenorphine knowledge scores (pretest, 2.2; posttest, 3.5; P < 0.001), all 7 self-efficacy items (all P < 0.001), mean buprenorphine attitudes (pretest, 3.1; posttest, 3.4; P < 0.001), and willingness to dispense to all four types of buprenorphine customers (all P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A brief buprenorphine training increased pharmacists' willingness to dispense buprenorphine. Although generalizability of the results may be limited by use of a convenience sample, our pharmacist-oriented training showed promising results and may be an important step in increasing availability of buprenorphine in community pharmacies.

Health Inequities Among People Who Use Drugs in a Post-Dobbs America: The Case for a Syndemic Analysis.

Punitive policy responses to substance use and to abortion care constitute direct attacks on personal liberty and bodily autonomy. In this article, we leverage the concept of "syndemics" to anticipate how the already synergistic stigmas against people who use drugs and people who seek abortion services will be further compounded the Dobbs decision.

Psychological safety and accountability in longitudinal integrated clerkships: a dual institution qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Psychological safety and accountability are frameworks to describe relationships in the workplace. Psychological safety is a shared belief by members of a team that it is safe to take interpersonal risks. Accountability refers to being challenged and expected to meet expectations and goals. Psychological safety and accountability are supported by relational trust. Relational continuity is the educational construct underpinning longitudinal integrated clerkships. The workplace constructs of psychological safety and accountability may offer lenses to understand students' educational experiences in longitudinal integrated clerkships. METHODS: We performed a qualitative study of 9 years of longitudinal integrated clerkship graduates from two regionally diverse programs-at Harvard Medical School and the University of North Carolina School of Medicine. We used deductive content analysis to characterize psychological safety and accountability from semi-structured interviews of longitudinal integrated clerkship graduates. RESULTS: Analysis of 20 graduates' interview transcripts reached saturation. We identified 109 discrete excerpts describing psychological safety, accountability, or both. Excerpts with high psychological safety described trusting relationships and safe learning spaces. Low psychological safety included fear and frustration and perceptions of stressful learning environments. Excerpts characterizing high accountability involved increased learning and responsibility toward patients. Low accountability included students not feeling challenged. Graduates' descriptions with both high psychological safety and high accountability characterized optimized learning and performance. CONCLUSIONS: This study used the workplace-based frameworks of psychological safety and accountability to explore qualitatively longitudinal integrated clerkship graduates' experiences as students. Graduates described high and low psychological safety and accountability. Graduates' descriptions of high psychological safety and accountability involved positive learning experiences and responsibility toward patients. The relational lenses of psychological safety and accountability may inform faculty development and future educational research in clinical medical education.

Examining differences in opioid deaths by race in North Carolina following the STOP Act, 2010-2019.

INTRODUCTION: North Carolina's 2017 STOP Act implemented several measures to address the increasing opioid overdose death rate. However, due to racial differences prescription opioid use and treatment service access, the STOP Act may exhibit differential impacts by race. This study examined the impact of the STOP Act on opioid overdose deaths by race. METHODS: State-level secondary data were compiled for all 50 states. Race-stratified opioid overdose rates were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's WONDER database from 2010 to 2019. The study obtained state-level population characteristics from the Current Population Surveys from 2010 to 2016, the CDC's 2017 Drug Surveillance Report, the National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services from 2011 to 2016, and the National Survey on Drug Use and Health from 2010 to 2016. We obtained outcomes from 2010 to 2019 and state characteristics were obtained for the pre-STOP Act period (2010-2016) as available. Using the synthetic control method, we created two synthetic North Carolinas, one Black/African American and one White, from a weighted average of other states similar to North Carolina in terms of pre-STOP Act race-stratified opioid overdose rates and population characteristics. Change was assessed as the difference in the race-stratified opioid overdose death rate for North Carolina the corresponding synthetic control. RESULTS: The opioid overdose death rate among the White population decreased by 7.17 and 8.96 deaths/100 k in 2018 and 2019 following the STOP Act (overall decrease p = .0217); however, the study found no significant change in the opioid overdose death rate among the Black/African American population (overall decrease p = .1053), with decreases 1.68 and 3.2 deaths/100 k in 2018 and 2019, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the STOP Act reduced the opioid overdose death rate in North Carolina among the White, but not Black/African American, population. This heterogeneous effect has implications for health equity and can inform the development of future substance use policies.

Addressing buprenorphine bottlenecks in the context of MAT Act implementation: A shared responsibility.

Medications for opioid use disorder (OUD) such as buprenorphine reduce overdose mortality and other opioid related acute health events but have historically been highly regulated. The recent Mainstreaming Addiction Treatment (MAT) Act ended the requirement clinicians complete a specified training and apply for a DATA 2000 ("X") waiver on their Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) number, to prescribe buprenorphine. With the MAT Act, any practitioner with Schedule III prescribing authority (a regular DEA number) can now prescribe buprenorphine for OUD. While this has potential to improve OUD treatment access, the impact will depend on implementation. Though the MAT Act may facilitate increased buprenorphine prescribing, ensuring adequate buprenorphine dispensing is also critical to improving Medications for opioid use disorder. Recognized buprenorphine bottlenecks arise from a complex convergence of factors in community pharmacies, threatening to undercut the benefits of the MAT Act. If prescribing increases but is not matched by increased dispensing, bottlenecks may worsen. Any worsening of buprenorphine bottlenecks could have a disproportionate impact in rural areas where residents may rely on fewer pharmacies to fill prescriptions for people in larger geographic area and where larger prescribing-dispensing gaps already exist such as in Southern states. Rigorous research will be needed to document the overall impact of the MAT Act on community pharmacists and their patients. At the federal level, pharmacists and their professional organizations should lobby the DEA to de-schedule or re-schedule buprenorphine. The DEA should announce a moratorium on enforcement actions against wholesalers and pharmacies related to buprenorphine distribution and dispensing. More supports should be offered to community pharmacies by state pharmacy boards and associations including continuing pharmacy education and technical assistance for advocating with wholesalers to increase buprenorphine order sizes, and to more effectively communicate with prescribers. Pharmacies should not have to face these challenges alone. Regulators, wholesalers, and researchers must join together with community pharmacies to further reduce regulatory barriers to dispensing, provide evidence-based interventions where needed to support pharmacy dispensing efforts, conduct rigorous implementation research, and be constantly vigilant in identifying and addressing multi-level buprenorphine bottlenecks in the wake of the MAT Act.

Factors in rural community buprenorphine dispensing.

Background: There are pharmacy-related barriers to the dispensing of buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid use disorders. These include pharmacists' moral objections and mistrust of treatment regimens; the perception of a limit on the amount of buprenorphine able to be ordered and dispensed; stigma and concerns about diversion; and knowledge and communication gaps. Objectives: To document pharmacy stakeholders' awareness and interpretation of regulatory policies that may impact rural community pharmacists' willingness and ability to dispense buprenorphine. To identify factors that affect rural community pharmacists' willingness and ability to dispense buprenorphine in Appalachian North Carolina. Methods: Qualitative analysis and thematic coding of phone interviews with eight pharmacists from several rural North Carolina counties where local health departments recently began prescribing MOUD and four pharmacy industry stakeholders representing knowledge of wholesale distributors and pharmacy education. Results: Three major themes were identified: stigma and misinformation, provider-prescriber communication, and perceived and actual regulatory constraints. A number of respondents indicated a desire to better understand MOUD treatment plans and displayed a misunderstanding of evidence-based treatment guidelines. Stakeholders indicated the importance of pharmacists establishing a relationship with prescribers and described pharmacist preference for dispensing buprenorphine to established patients over new or out-of-area patients. Pharmacist stakeholders and industry/education stakeholders expressed concern over a perceived DEA 'cap' for buprenorphine ordering. Conclusions: This study provides insight on possible approaches to address rural pharmacy-related barriers patients may face when filling buprenorphine prescriptions. There is a demonstrated need for further pharmacist training on evidence-based practices for treating opioid use disorders and ordering limits, as well as a need for increased communication between prescribers and pharmacists.

North Carolina pharmacists' willingness to sell fentanyl test strips: a survey study.

BACKGROUND: Although fentanyl test strips (FTS) can accurately determine the presence of fentanyl in unregulated substances, access to FTS remains limited. This study aimed to examine North Carolina community pharmacists' attitudes and willingness to engage in various behaviors related to FTS sales and distribution. METHODS: A convenience sample of community pharmacists completed an online survey that assessed: (1) comfort initiating an FTS conversation; (2) willingness to sell FTS, distribute FTS instructions, counsel on FTS, refer patients to harm reduction organizations, and advertise FTS; (3) perceived barriers and benefits of selling FTS; and (4) interest in FTS training. Data were collected from March to May 2022. Descriptive statistics were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 592 pharmacists who participated, most were somewhat or very willing to refer patients to harm reduction organizations for FTS (514, 86.9%), counsel on FTS (485, 81.9%), distribute FTS instructions (475, 80.2%), sell FTS (470, 79.3%), and advertise FTS for sale (372, 62.9%). The most commonly reported benefits of selling FTS were reducing overdose deaths in the community (n = 482, 81.4%) and participating in community harm reduction efforts (n = 455; 76.9%). Barriers commonly reported to selling FTS were: not knowing where to order FTS (n = 295, 49.8%) and discomfort initiating a conversation about FTS (n = 266, 44.9%). Most respondents (88.3%) were interested in FTS training. CONCLUSION: North Carolina community pharmacists are willing to engage in various behaviors related to FTS sales and distribution. Most pharmacists were interested in receiving FTS training, which should be created to address pharmacist-reported barriers to FTS sales. Pharmacist distribution of FTS could increase access to FTS at the community level and has the potential to change drug use behavior and reduce overdose deaths.

Factors associated with perceived ease of access to syringes in Appalachian North Carolina.

PURPOSE: To examine associations between perceived ease of syringe access, syringe sources, injection behaviors, and law enforcement (LE) interactions among people who inject drugs (PWID) in rural Appalachian North Carolina (NC). METHODS: Using respondent-driven sampling, a diverse sample of 309 self-reported PWID were recruited from rural Appalachian NC. Data were collected via audio computer-assisted self-interview technology from February 2019 through March 2020. Respondents reported demographics, sources of syringes, LE interactions, and injection behaviors. Univariate, bivariate, and linear regression analyses were performed. FINDINGS: Respondents most often obtained syringes from pharmacies and syringe service programs (SSPs). Twenty-one percent disagreed that it was easy to obtain sterile syringes, with 28% reporting low or no access to an SSP. PWID who reported longer physical distances to an SSP had greater difficulty accessing syringes (P<.001). PWID who reported greater ease of access to syringes reported engaging in receptive syringe sharing less often (P<.01). PWID who were stopped and searched by LE more often reported injecting drugs somebody else prepared with nonsterile supplies more often (P<.01). Participants shared used injection supplies more than twice as often than they shared used syringes. CONCLUSIONS: These results underscore the importance of SSPs to mitigate the spread of human immunodeficiency virus and viral hepatitis in rural areas. Supporting mobile SSP services in rural areas could increase access to sterile syringes and injection supplies. SSPs should educate PWID about the importance of not sharing injection supplies. Pharmacies could increase syringe access in areas where SSPs do not operate.

"They don't go by the law around here": law enforcement interactions after the legalization of syringe services programs in North Carolina.

BACKGROUND: In 2016, the US state of North Carolina (NC) legalized syringe services programs (SSPs), providing limited immunity from misdemeanor syringe possession when law enforcement is presented documentation that syringes were obtained from an SSP. This study explores the law enforcement interactions experienced by SSP participants since the enactment of this law. METHODS: This study used a convergent, mixed-methods design consisting of structured surveys and semi-structured interviews with SSP participants in seven NC counties. Survey and interview data were collected simultaneously between January and November 2019. This survey was designed to capture demographics, characteristics of drug use, SSP services used, and past-year negative experiences with law enforcement (officer did not recognize SSP card, did not believe SSP card belonged to participant, confiscated SSP card, confiscated syringes, or arrested participant for possessing syringes). Semi-structured interviews explored lived experiences with and perspectives on the same topics covered in the survey. RESULTS: A total of 414 SSP participants completed the survey (45% male, 54% female, 1% transgender or non-binary; 65% White, 22% Black, 5% American Indian/Alaskan Native, 8% some other racial identity). 212 participants (51.2%) reported at least one past-year negative experience with law enforcement. Chi-square testing suggests that Black respondents were more likely to report having experienced law enforcement doubt their SSP card belonged to them. Interview data indicate that law enforcement practices vary greatly across counties, and that negative and/or coercive interactions reduce expectations among SSP participants that they will be afforded the protections granted by NC law. CONCLUSION: Despite laws which protect SSP participants from charges, negative law enforcement responses to syringe possession are still widely reported. Evidence-based policy interventions to reduce fatal overdose are undermined by these experiences. Our findings suggest NC residents, and officers who enforce these laws, may benefit from clarification as to what is required of the documents which identify participants of registered SSPs where they may legally obtain syringes. Likewise, more thorough trainings on NC's syringe law for law enforcement officers may be merited. Further research is needed to assess geographic differences in SSP participants' law enforcement interactions across race and gender.

Eligible Prescriber Experiences with Substance Use Disorder Treatment and Perceptions of Pharmacy Barriers to Buprenorphine.

OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this study was to better understand North Carolina providers' specific substance use disorder (SUD) and opioid use disorder treatment practices and buprenorphine prescribing. Furthermore, this study aimed to provide novel information regarding US South and rural providers' opioid use disorder treatment behaviors and perceptions of patient experience at community pharmacies. METHODS: An online survey consisting of closed-ended and open-ended questions was used. Surveys were delivered to healthcare providers' e-mails and self-administered. Surveys were administered through an online survey platform. RESULTS: In total, 332 healthcare providers, who were eligible to be X-waivered to prescribe buprenorphine, completed the online survey. Survey participants reported not having their X-waiver to prescribe buprenorphine or actively prescribing buprenorphine. The majority of participants were uncertain of potential barriers to filling buprenorphine prescriptions. Providers treating a mix of rural and urban patients reported being less likely to screen for SUDs. Although there were no rurality differences in SUD screening, providers who treat mostly rural patients reported a lack of SUD treatment options in their area. CONCLUSIONS: Early detection of SUDs can help prevent negative health outcomes for patients. Regardless of patient rurality, providers should screen for SUDs and familiarize themselves with the patient's experience when filling a buprenorphine prescription, along with possible barriers. Furthermore, providers should incorporate questions about their patient's ability to receive buprenorphine to help ensure that patients are receiving proper and necessary treatment.

Hepatitis C and HIV Screening, Testing, and Risk Perceptions among South-Central Appalachian County Health Department Staff.

OBJECTIVES: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are significant public health concerns, especially given the risks for disease interactions. Rates of HCV and HIV are increasing, especially in rural areas. Local health departments (LHDs) play an important role in rural health care, offering screening, testing, and treatment for HCV and HIV. Gaps persist in LHD resources for meeting these demands, especially in Appalachia and the US South. METHODS: To explore HCV/HIV screening, testing, and treatment approaches and perspectives in south-central Appalachian North Carolina, structured telephone questionnaires were administered to communicable disease nurses and other health department staff directly involved in screening and testing. Mixed-methods data analyses were conducted and triangulated with stakeholders. RESULTS: Eighteen participants representing 19 counties completed the questionnaire, achieving a saturation sample. Participants reported barriers to screening and testing, including housing insecurity, lack of transportation and insurance, unemployment, and the isolation of living in a rural area. Divergence in perceptions of barriers between public health regions emerged, as did perceptions of who is at risk and use of stigmatizing language about people at risk for HCV/HIV. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the impact of LHD behaviors and perceptions on screening and testing, and offers recommendations to improve HCV/HIV screening and testing accessibility in south-central Appalachia, a high-risk region.

Increasing North Carolina's Workforce Capacity for Prescribing Buprenorphine Products.

BACKGROUND Inadequate access to opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment is a public health concern. Rates of opioid-related poisoning deaths are increasing in North Carolina and access to OUD treatment is especially sparse in rural areas. DEA-X-waivered providers that can prescribe buprenorphine as a medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) play an essential role in treating OUD. Increased workforce capacity to treat OUD in an evidence-based, equitable, and patient-centered way is needed. Gaps persist in continuing professional education and academic training.METHODS Description of an interdisciplinary training team effort to engage medical residencies and advanced practice provider (APP) programs across North Carolina in a set of subsidized trainings about substance use disorder treatment and medication-assisted treatment (MAT), with the goal of increasing capacity to administer MOUD, based on each program's needs. Uptake was independently evaluated.RESULTS Engagement exceeded initial goals: 72 unique trainings related to MAT were administered to 1512 providers from 30 residency and 7 APP programs. By the end of the grant period, 902 participants completed a training required to obtain a DEA-X waiver. Evaluation of training uptake identified facilitators and barriers specific to residents and APP trainees.LIMITATIONS Limitations included difficulty coordinating training with existing didactic and clinical schedules during the project time frame and challenges identifying implementation leaders at training sites.CONCLUSION This project highlights a successful and potentially replicable approach to offering structured MAT capacity-building training in combination with technical assistance (TA) within medical education programs.

A content review of buprenorphine training programs for pharmacists.

Objectives: To identify and describe continuing education (CE) credit-bearing training programs for pharmacists that cover buprenorphine dispensing. Methods: Five CE databases were searched for trainings that were in English, targeted to pharmacists, addressed use of buprenorphine for opioid use disorder treatment, not state-specific, accredited by the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education, and available for online registration. Results: Twelve trainings met the inclusion criteria. The most common topics covered were background and statistical information (10 trainings) and the clinical role of buprenorphine in medication assisted therapy (9 trainings). No training covered all 10 topics assessed. Seven programs included content on prescribing barriers, but of those, only two briefly addressed buprenorphine dispensing barriers, and none addressed the widespread belief that the Drug Enforcement Administration sets limits on the amount of buprenorphine that can be ordered and stocked. A majority of the programs (75%) addressed the clinical details of treatment, but only five addressed social barriers, such as stigma. Conclusion: Future trainings should develop and increase pharmacists' awareness of content to address the gaps identified in this study so they can supplement existing trainings, especially related to DEA and wholesaler regulations and thresholds, communication, stigma, and ways of overcoming these.

North Carolina community pharmacists' buprenorphine dispensing practices and attitudes.

BACKGROUND: Many barriers, including stocking behaviors and pharmacist attitudes, can limit access to buprenorphine in pharmacy settings. OBJECTIVES: To assess North Carolina (NC) pharmacists' (1) buprenorphine stocking behaviors, (2) awareness and interpretation of federal and state policy regarding buprenorphine, (3) perceptions about changes in buprenorphine demand, and (4) reasons for not dispensing buprenorphine, including attitudes. METHODS: A convenience sample of currently practicing community pharmacists was recruited to participate in a 10-minute online survey. The survey included demographic questions and assessed pharmacists' buprenorphine ordering, stocking, and dispensing behaviors. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and logistic regressions examined associations with whether pharmacists (1) had ever refused to fill a buprenorphine prescription and (2) perceived buprenorphine dispensing limits. RESULTS: The majority (96%) of respondents (n = 646, completion rate = 5.5%) kept buprenorphine in stock regularly or ordered it as needed, with generic formulations being stocked most often. Many pharmacists (62%) had refused to fill a buprenorphine prescription. Pharmacists with more negative buprenorphine attitudes were more likely to refuse to fill a buprenorphine prescription. Many pharmacists (31%) believed there were buprenorphine ordering limits, with wholesalers most commonly being perceived as the source. Pharmacists with more negative buprenorphine attitudes were more likely to perceive buprenorphine ordering limits, while pharmacists who worked at national chain, grocery or regional chains, and other pharmacy types were less likely to perceive ordering limits than independent pharmacies. CONCLUSION: Although most pharmacies stocked buprenorphine products, pharmacists' refusal to dispense and perceived ordering limits could limit patient access. Refusal and perceived ordering limits were associated with pharmacist attitudes and pharmacy type. Training that addresses logistical and attitudinal barriers to dispensing buprenorphine may equip pharmacists to address buprenorphine access barriers.

Perinatal OUD Treatment Provider Understandings of Rural Patients' Experiences.

OBJECTIVES: To present perspectives of substance use treatment providers offering perinatal opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment in a largely rural, Appalachian region. To demonstrate the extent to which providers sought to understand their patients' experiences accessing treatment and how this understanding informed providers' approach to offering patient-centered care. METHODS: A qualitative study combining semi-structured interviews and participant-observation with perinatal substance use treatment providers, conducted within a comprehensive program. Using purposive and opportunistic sampling with key informants (n = 10), a saturation sample was achieved. Data were analyzed using modified Grounded Theory. RESULTS: Perinatal substance use treatment providers had a good understanding of their patients' experiences seeking treatment for opioid use disorder, including being aware of obstacles patients encountered. This understanding allowed providers to better address patients' needs in and out of the clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Participants demonstrated a good understanding of what their largely rural, Appalachian patients experienced when attempting to access perinatal OUD treatment. This understanding may enable more patient-centered care.

United States immigration detention amplifies disease interaction risk: A model for a transnational ICE-TB-DM2 syndemic.

Detention and removal of unauthorised immigrants by United States (U.S.) Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has steadily increased despite declining rates of unauthorised migration. ICE detainees are held in overcrowded detention centres, often without due process and deprived of adequate food, sanitation, and medical care. Conditions of ICE detention contribute to malnutrition and increase the likelihood of infectious disease exposure, including tuberculosis (TB). TB infection interacts with Type 2 Diabetes (DM2), disproportionately affecting individuals who are routinely targeted by federal immigration practices. When two diseases interact and exacerbate one another within a larger structural context, thereby amplifying multiple disease interactions, this is called a syndemic. In this paper, we examine malnutrition in ICE detention as a pathway of bidirectional risks for and interactions between TB and DM2 among ICE detainees. Drawing from literature on detention conditions, TB, and DM2 rates along the U.S.-Mexico border, we propose an ICE-TB-DM2 syndemic model. We present a map displaying our proposed syndemic model to demonstrate the spatial application of syndemic theory in the context of ICE detention, strengthening the growing scholarship on syndemics of incarceration and removal.